World SPORT news

August 4, 2010

Sex advice: My husband wants to play mistress and servant

Filed under: Bostonherald — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 6:25 pm

Q I found some porn that my husband had downloaded on our computer (I subsequently discovered that he had wanted me to find it) with a lot of images of dominant women and submissive men. He says that it is something that he is very drawn to. I am quite open-minded and excited by the idea, but I don’t know where to start. Your advice would be appreciated.

A The current celebration of leather and wet-look PVC, plus burgeoning bondage sections in every online sex store, are testimony to the fact that it has gone mainstream.

From leopardskin blindfolds to snakeskin whips or Swarovski crystal handcuffs, fashionable restraint is a consumer-driven experience — and the imagery associated with it nearly always features an aesthetically bound woman, the assumption being that the male is dominant.

However, as you may soon find out, “bondage lite” has very little in common with the experience that your husband is steering you towards. If you agree to allow your husband to explore his submissive side, you are, in effect, volunteering to take on the role of dominant partner in your physical relationship and you ought to be aware that this contract may permanently alter the sexual dynamic between you.

On a practical level, if your husband is physically restrained, he relinquishes all control and you are forced to become the pro-active sexual partner. That’s quite a responsibility because, although the word submission implies passivity, most male submissives want to be actively taken in hand, which involves you making demands and meting out punishments when you may prefer to be watching Corrie.

On the plus side, male submissives don’t confine their desire to serve to sex alone and they tend to be very handy with a hoover and a duster too. Elise Sutton, a psychotherapist, explains that what submissive males are searching for is not merely an alternative form of sexuality, but a kind of “loving female authority”, which ultimately empowers women. And certainly, any women who take on the role of “domme” seem to relish it.

However, before you make any promises to him, make sure that you are fully aware of what you might be letting yourself in for. The best books on the subject are The Mistress Manual: The Good Girl’s Guide to Female Dominance, by Mistress Lorelei, The Art of Sensual Female Dominance: A Guide for Women, by Claudia Varrin, or Screw the Roses, Send Me the Thorns: The Romance and Sexual Sorcery of Sadomasochism, by Philip Miller and Molly Devon (all available from amazon.co.uk). You can also learn a lot from online forums. The best ones are not commercially orientated (informedconsent.co.uk or fetlife.com) and they welcome newbies.

As the dominant partner, you will be responsible for your husband’s safety, so you will need to know what you are doing. Submission and domination come in a range of strengths — from fluffy handcuffs to masks that render the wearer deaf and blind — and it is only through experimentation that you and your husband will you find what works for you.

To test the water, you and your husband may want to try dressing up and visiting a fetish club. If you stick to larger commercial venues such as Torture Garden (torturegarden.com) you will be able to blend in and observe the theatre without worrying about participation.

July 30, 2010

Wedded bliss? It really is a game of two halves

Filed under: Bostonherald — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 6:25 pm

I made such a mistake 50 years ago today. It was my wedding day — not that that was a mistake, certainly not, but these past few months I have been cursing the fact that I chose June 11, l960, to get married. Why did I not think of checking my diary and working out that 2010 would be a World Cup year? Such rotten planning. What a dum-dum.

It means that today I will be celebrating my golden wedding, in theory, but in practice I will be settling down to watch the opening of the World Cup. No competition, really. Anything you want to say, pet, for the next four weeks, can you say it now or do a note and I’ll read it later, possibly.

We got married at Oxford Register Office, straight after her last exam, but we could easily have made it later and this awful clash would never have happened. I had paid for a cheap package holiday to Sardinia before the prices went up in the summer proper.

I had also timed our wedding for the day after I sat my driving test. I had this fantasy of driving my new bride to London in a car I had just bought, a l947 2.5 Riley — what a mistake that was, load of trouble — then staying overnight at the flat we had found at six guineas a week in the Vale of Health in Hampstead. In the event I failed my test. Oh, the ignominy. This meant that our best man, Mike, had to come with us on the first stage of our honeymoon, as he had a driving licence.

It just seems like yesterday, which is what we all say, anyone over 33, so I am pretty surprised to have notched up 50 years. And yet I am not surprised. You read all this stuff about marriages today lasting half an hour, or 35 minutes with a light wind, yet when I look around, all my oldest friends and closest relations seem to have been married for ever. My wife’s brother has been married for 53 years, while my brother has got to 44, both to the same wife. Well, not exactly the same. They picked different women. Obviously.

I have bought her a suitable golden wedding present, being not totally without feelings. A little piece of something made of gold that I bought months ago. Looking ahead, eh. Well, when the Big 50 looms it’s hard to be unaware.

I know what she will say when I hand it over after breakfast this morning. “Gold? You know I don’t like gold. How long have you known me?”

For ever, is the answer. Since we were at school. But I like to keep up traditions. For our pearl wedding I bought her pearls, which she said at the time that she liked, but never wears, and a silver watch for our silver wedding, which I suppose was silly. Even I have observed that she has never worn a watch.

Today I don’t wear a watch either — gave them up ten years ago. When asked why I say that it is because I like to get my wrists brown, but really I think it was her influence. None of our three children wears a watch, either. You see, in a long marriage you are influenced by the other partner.

I have had little influence over her as far as football is concerned, in that she will not be watching any games. But she does follow football, reads all the back pages, ask her anything about John Terry’s twins, Wayne’s wife, Stevie G’s missus, she knows all their names, even their birthdays. She knows all 23 players and why currently we love/hate/despair of each of them.

Michael Dawson rather foxed her. He was a late arrival but I managed to fit in a short seminar despite my awfully busy life, ie, getting out the charts, opening the wine bottles, lining up the crisps, screaming at the new telly.We are in the Lake District and the blokes delivering it wandered round the fields for hours, totally lost, while I stood in our garden shouting and waving at them, thinking, oh God, I’m going to miss the kick-off.

With 32 live games to watch, I decided that I needed a half-decent telly. How often does a World Cup come round? Wedding anniversaries, you get one every year.

“Going somewhere nice tonight for your golden?” friends have been asking. Yes, Uruguay-France at 7.30 — don’t ring cause I won’t answer. She didn’t want to go out tonight, anyway. So she said. We’ve been out loads in our married life.

My dear wife is pleased for me, happy that I am happy. She likes me having something to look forward to. I work round the games, doing a double shift down the word mine, so I feel that I deserve it. She has so much to do herself, happily.

I think that in a long marriage it is good to have different interests. Less to argue about.

June 30, 2010

The secret lives of boys and girls

Filed under: Bostonherald — Tags: , , , — admin @ 6:25 pm

My daughter turned 5 recently and for her birthday we gave her a bright pink Hello Kitty scooter. She invited only girls to her party, and they ate pink and white ice-cream cake off Princess plates and drank pink lemonade from Princess cups. They made flower necklaces and played Pin the Crown on the Princess. I’m a bit embarrassed to admit all of this – especially now that I’ve read Lise Eliot’s book Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow into Troublesome Gaps – and What We Can Do About It. In it she talks about the way most parents, almost without thinking, segregate their children by gender, inundating the girls with Barbies and ballet, the boys with diggers and football. It constitutes, she says, “a round-the-clock indoctrination into the world of brave, cheeky boys and cute, squeaky girls, well before they even start primary school”. Not only is it unnecessary, says Eliot, it is not in our children’s best interests.

So when I meet her in Chicago, I ask her: am I doing my daughter a disservice? “I don’t think you are,” she says kindly. “But I think as a culture we are. We let the marketers decide this for us. If you’d gone to the store and there had been an equally attractive [gender-neutral] scooter, maybe you’d have got her that.” Hmm, maybe. And maybe not. My daughter had her heart set on that pink scooter. But in her first five years she has spent almost as much time playing with her two brothers’ trains and Magna-Tiles as she has with her dolls and tea sets. Now that she is going through a pink-princess phase, my attitude is just to humour it, assuming that it too will pass. “A lot of growing up is rejecting the last phase,” confirms Eliot. “So that’s great if she can get it out of her system when she’s 5, and not have to be obsessing with her femininity when she’s 15. I just think we shouldn’t assume it’s all free will. It’s marketing that creates these choices for us.”

Eliot, who is Associate Professor of Neuroscience at the Chicago Medical School, speaks from experience, both as a scientist and a mother. At 48, with a daughter and two sons herself, she says she wishes she had known more about the plasticity of young brains when her first child was born 15 years ago. “We all assume that children are hard-wired to be either boys or girls. People think that if boys’ and girls’ brains are different it’s because they’re born that way. They don’t appreciate that your brain is really just a reflection of your life.”

We meet at her home in Lake Bluff, a serene suburb of Chicago. Although her book is packed with data and research, she talks in a down-to-earth and accessible way about her own experience as a mother and makes no claims to perfection. “I learnt everything the hard way,” she says. “There are so many things I wish I’d done differently, particularly with my daughter. I took her on bike rides with me and tried to encourage her physical bravery, but I absolutely should have signed her up for more sports. Now when I suggest to her that she try out for something not stereotypically feminine, she says: ‘Oh, Mom, it’s that darned gender book again – I’m not your guinea pig.’”

Expecting her to dismiss the question as facile, I ask her if she is suggesting that it would be better from birth if we dressed boys in pink and gave girls guns. She considers this carefully before answering. “Because the brain is so plastic early on, I do think we can do more to bring out untraditional strengths in boys and girls if we want to. They’re not hard-wired for anything: not speech nor maths nor interpersonal skills, nor reading: nothing. Most of what we do with our brains is acquired through experience.”

But it is not as simple as switching the trucks and the dolls. “Many parents have tried this, to little effect,” she writes in her book. “Girls turned the trucks into families, boys played catch with the dolls, and both sexes knew there was something fishy going on.” It has more to do with how you treat your children from the very earliest days. Gender differences, she argues, arise from the way babies and children are nurtured. In pushing this point, she is going against the grain of current thinking. Books such as The Female Brain and The Male Brain by neuropsychiatrist Louann Brizendine maintain the entrenched view that men are from Mars, women from Venus. Eliot rolls her eyes when I mention Brizendine. “She gets it completely wrong.”

In her book, Eliot says that Brizendine’s statement that baby boys do not bond as easily as baby girls with their parents “is not only wrong, it’s downright subversive”. If parents think that boys are less social, they are likely to interact less with them, thus making it a self-fulfilling prophecy. She is equally derisive about the idea that females are alone in their ability to read faces, defuse conflict and form deep friendships whereas boys are hard-wired for aggression and are less empathetic.

Not that Eliot is claiming that boys’ and girls’ brains are identical. Only that we as a culture exaggerate minor differences until they become major ones. “Our philosophy about these things actually shapes our parenting and our culture: if you believe that boys and girls are fundamentally different, it can’t help but alter the way we act and the expectations we have. Of course, genes and hormones play a role in creating boy/girl differences, but they are only the beginning. Social factors are proving to be far more powerful than we previously realised.”

We go upstairs to her children’s bedrooms. Naturally, I am expecting something very gender-neutral, so it is a surprise to see that the room shared by her two boys, Sam and Toby, aged 14 and 11, is stuffed full of car paraphernalia, with fighter planes dangling from the ceiling. The bedroom of her daughter Julia, 15, has a predominantly pink theme, accentuated by a bright pink fluffy lampshade.

I look at her and she laughs: “I know, I know! Maybe you’re doing exactly the right thing with your daughter and her pink scooter, because I did exactly the opposite. Julia had a blue bike because we knew we weren’t going to buy another bike when her little brother was big enough. She had cleats [sports shoes with studs] that could be handed down – ‘No pink cleats for you,’ we said. Yet here she is, this hyper-feminine teenager who lies awake at night thinking about what she’s going to wear for the prom. She has more mascaras than I’ve owned in my entire life.”

Eliot says that even the most progressive parents subconsciously treat their sons and daughters differently. In her book, she describes an experiment where newborns are dressed in gender-neutral clothes: “People are very disconcerted if they don’t know if a baby is a boy or a girl, and they don’t know how to interact with the baby, which is telling in itself.” When adults were misled into thinking they knew the sex of a baby, by calling a baby girl Jonathan or dressing a baby boy in pink, they would interpret identical behaviour through a gender-tinted lens. Adults would describe the “boys” (actually girls) as angry or distressed more often than those adults who knew their true sex. And they would describe the “girls” (actually boys) as joyful and engaged more often than adults who knew the babies were boys.

In another experiment mothers were asked to gauge the ability of their 11-month-old babies to negotiate a carpeted slope by changing the slope’s angle based on what they thought their children could handle. Mothers of infant boys were almost spot-on in predicting their sons’ abilities, but the girls’ mums severely underestimated their daughters. “Are mothers therefore the culprits in limiting girls’ athletic prowess?” Eliot asks.

Eliot says her husband, also a scientist, is more emotionally articulate than many men, but that they still fall into fairly gender-typical roles at home. All the juggling – children, house, job – falls squarely on her shoulders. “I think women’s lives have improved enormously, but they could be better. I feel so stressed most of the time I just want to put a gun to my head,” she adds candidly. “And I don’t think my husband suffers that as much.”

As a child growing up near her current home, Lise had three older brothers and spent most of her time trying to get herself included in their games. “I don’t know if it’s just the way I am, or having brothers, but I was never into girlie things. I liked to play with my brothers’ Matchbox cars and tag along with them. I think playing with my brothers’ toys probably fuelled my interest in how things worked. That’s what I liked about biology: understanding how the body works.”

Nevertheless, she does feel that she was born before girls were routinely encouraged to be sporting. “Had I been born ten years later, I think I’d have been some kind of athlete. I always really liked sports.” Since her childhood, she says, the pendulum has swung back, some would say too far in the opposite direction, shortchanging boys. “Girls are now playing more sports and being taken seriously as maths and science students,” says Eliot as we set out to collect her children from school. “They can be anything they want: athletes, artists, cheerleaders. Boys have not been given the same breadth, and it has led to what some people call a boy crisis in education, not so much because of parent culture but because of kid culture and school culture.”

Most of the time Eliot does not intervene when she hears parents treating their children in gender stereotypical ways. But occasionally she cannot bite her tongue. “The other day I was at my son’s soccer game. It’s a boys’ league, but there is one girl on the team and the mother of one of my son’s team-mates was getting enraged when her son was losing the ball to the girl. ‘Don’t get beat by a girl,’ she was shouting to him, her little daughter standing right next to her. I said: ‘Come on, what does being a girl have to do with it?’”

Arriving at her daughter’s high school, we find her sitting outside on the steps. Slim and stunning with huge eyes, long blonde hair tied back into a ponytail, tight jeans and silver flip-flops, she is friendly and chatty. Later, we pick up Eliot’s younger son, Toby, who has just finished band practice. Wearing navy sports gear, he slides into the back of the car and offers no information about his day. I ask him what instrument he plays: “Trumpet,” he says – and that is his only word on the journey home. From the little I see, they seem to divide down fairly gender-stereotypical lines.

“I started out,” Eliot continues, “writing a book about the differences between the brains of boys and girls. We all knew they were different, it was just a matter of telling a curious parent why they were different. But the evidence just wasn’t there. To make a statement such as, ‘Girls are more social than boys’, which I believed, I had to pick out the papers and, yes, there are a few papers that showed that – but many more that didn’t. I just realised that I can’t say boys and girls are fundamentally different. So I actually went back and rewrote my early chapters.”

As a result, she has a book that is much more “socially relevant”. Not to mention controversial. “Everything is filtered through a lens of whether you believe boys and girls are hard-wired. I don’t think your average person appreciates that differences in the brain can be learnt.” Not, she says, that she is trying to make parents feel guilty; she just wants them to be more aware of the malleability of their children’s brains and their enormous potential. “I don’t want to be accused of saying it’s all environment and it’s all parents, I just want to right the ship. As a mother of both a daughter and sons, I believe we’ve got to find a better balance.”

As we drive back to her house, we pass two girls, one dressed in pink on a purple bike, the other in purple on a pink bike. I ask her whether she feels that the colour/gender coding is so entrenched that it is unshakable. “No, I see positive signs. If you look at some college campuses, you see kids dressing in ways that show they do not want to be identified as male or female and that is a huge revolution.”

But shouldn’t we also celebrate the differences between boys and girls? Do we really want a homogenous sea of boy-girls and girl-boys? “I think we should celebrate diversity and appreciate that boys and girls are different in some ways; but it’s not categorical. The danger of celebrating the differences is pigeonholing. Ultimately, we’re limiting ourselves and we’re limiting our kids.”

How to break male stereotypes

Talk to your baby boys

Of all the purported tricks for raising smarter children, this is the only one that has been scientifically proven. Parents of boys should err on the side of talkativeness. Use every interaction as a chance to communicate: narrate your activities, sing songs and introduce your baby to word play such as rhymes and alliteration. Baby talk, or “parentese”, is an especially effective style of communication, as research has shown that it exaggerates and emphasises the differences among speech sounds. What don’t work, however, are baby DVDs. As one recent study found, an hour a day of such viewing between 8 and 16 months of age was associated with a 17 percentile drop in vocabulary development.

Listen, too

By the end of the first year, there are probably several words hidden amid their babababas and mamamamas, though few parents pay close enough attention to notice them. So here’s another chance to promote your child’s verbal development, especially in boys: stop, listen and respond to his vocalisations. In other words, talk to your baby, but don’t talk over him. Babies don’t coo or babble much without an audience. They do it to communicate, and you can increase and improve their verbal output by responding, commenting on, and, especially, imitating your baby’s budding vocalisations.

Read stories

Of course, babies of both sexes should be treated to this experience on a daily basis, but it may be especially important for boys, many of whom could use the extra dose of language and emotional enrichment. Even if your baby’s only interest in books involves grabbing them and chewing, this stage shall pass.

Stop parking your baby

Boys’ motor development can suffer from being parked in various infant holders. An additional issue for boys is the social isolation these seats enforce. Carted around like an extra handbag, a baby in a car seat simply doesn’t get the same amount of attention he would receive if he were being held in his parents’ arms or in a sling or front carrier. Limit the number of such seats to the bare minimum – a car seat (but only for car journeys), a high chair (but only for meals) and a pushchair (but only for long walks).

Be responsive

Simply put, boys are often more needy as infants than girls are. They are less physically mature and take longer to develop the self-calming skills, such as hand-sucking or pulling into a tightly tucked posture, that help them compensate when overwhelmed. Parents may need to step in sooner with a boy, picking him up, changing his position, or giving him a soothing ring to grasp and suck on. Here is where stereotypes can get in the way. In the general spirit of “toughening them up”, parents may let their baby boys fuss and squirm longer, or they may resort to artificial stimuli to entertain them without helping them to discover their own self-calming skills.

Teach motor skills

These don’t come as easily to boys as girls, but they are essential for the many pencil and paper tasks of primary school. If they don’t gravitate towards writing and drawing, pre-school-age boys can nonetheless work on their hand skill and co-ordination through tasks like cutting, stamping and building with small construction toys. Other ways to encourage writing skills in boys include painting or drawing at easels (which some boys may find easier than sitting still at a desk or table), typing (either on the computer or a real typewriter) and clipboarding (walking around tallying or charting objects in the environment).

Focus on feelings

Males of all ages tend to be less accurate at identifying emotions, both in themselves and in others. Parents and other care-givers can help boys give voice to their feelings from a young age, distinguishing happiness, sadness, anger, fear, disappointment, jealousy, embarrassment and shame. By nurturing the habit and vocabulary of emotional expression, parents can give boys a verbal outlet for their feelings and promote the empathy skills that tend to come a little less easily to them.

Get a pet

This is a great way to teach young boys nurturing skills. If a dog or cat is too much for you to handle, smaller pets, like goldfish, lizards or gerbils, are a great place to start. Most kids crave the chance to own their own animals. Taking responsibility for the family pet is a wonderful way to cultivate a boy’s sensitive, caring side.

How to break female stereotypes

Don’t ignore your daughter

Girls can sometimes be too easy. Quiet, complacent babies may not get as much attention as fussier types, and they may actually suffer from a lack of the stimulation and interaction needed to fully develop their motor and cognitive skills. While there are plenty of exceptions, girls fall into this category more often than boys. So here is another way that close physical contact can pay off: by keeping your baby nearby, you are more likely to interact more. These issues are every bit as important – if not more so – for babies in childcare. When one care-giver is responsible for several infants, the temptation to stereotype and respond to boys and girls in a one-size-fits-all way may be especially high.

Keep an open mind

This applies to children of all ages, but no age is too young to begin revising expectations for our children. Just because your child is a girl doesn’t mean she won’t be interested in trucks and trains and rolling a ball across the living room floor with you. Just because your child is a boy doesn’t mean he won’t be scared of going down the slide or doesn’t need lots of cuddling and nurturing.

Take risks

Because of baby girls’ smaller size, and possibly because of lingering stereotypes, parents tend to be more cautious with infant girls, permitting them less freedom to explore and to push their physical limits. But later on, girls begin falling behind boys in their physicality and spatial skills, and it’s clear that girls could benefit from greater physical challenges and earlier opportunities to explore. The fewer no’s your daughter hears, the more she will be inspired to follow her own natural curiosity. Girls need liberating.

Encourage physical play

Movement stimulates the brain’s vestibular system, the inner-ear sense that detects a body’s motion and position with respect to gravity. There is some evidence that vestibular stimulation – spinning, swinging, jumping, cartwheeling – enhances reflexes and gross motor development. Although girls do not lag behind boys in gross motor skills during the first year, they are slower and weaker from the preschool years onward. The benefits of vestibular stimulation are well enough proven to justify extra movement experience for young girls.

Play ball

Girls begin falling behind boys in certain spatial skills by the end of the preschool period. One theory is that boys’ greater movement and experience with projectiles – balls, darts, perceive three-dimensional moving objects, a sex difference that continues to grow throughout childhood. Girls’ spatial skills may therefore benefit from more movement and practice at ball games, targeting, and other hand-eye challenges.

Buy different toys

Many girls love building toys but they are often not marketed to appeal to them. Most of the themes (for example, Star Wars) and colours (black, yellow, grey, beige and army-fatigue green) are created with only boys in mind. Whatever the choice, playing with building toys and, specifically, translating a series of instructional diagrams into a three-dimensional structure provide excellent practice at the kind of visuospatial skill that is linked to higher mathematic achievement.

Play computer games

Guess what: video games are actually good for something. Several studies have now found that computer games involving spatial manipulation improve children’s ability to mentally visualise and rotate objects. Most of the studies have been done with older children and adolescents, and the gains are similar for both boys and girls. Considering, however, that this kind of spatial ability shows the largest sex difference of any cognitive skill, girls may especially benefit from being encouraged to play spatially orientated computer games from a young age, particularly those depicting three-dimensional objects or virtual navigation.

© Lise Eliot. Extracted from Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow into Troublesome Gaps – and What We Can Do About It by Lise Eliot, published by Oneworld, which is available from The Times Bookshop priced £11.69 (RRP £12.99), free p&p, on 0845 2712134; thetimes.co.uk/bookshop

June 25, 2010

Can the Big Society protect our children?

Filed under: Bostonherald — Tags: , , — admin @ 6:25 pm

Ah, the Big Society; we are all one happy family now, helping the elderly to cross the road, reading The Gruffalo at the local school, planting oaks in parks. It’s the coalition dream, a nation of volunteers who scrape the chewing gum from pavements, build extensions for their elderly parents and help out at soup kitchens in their spare time.

But remember how “hug a hoody” ended up with shopping centres banning Boden-wearing teenagers and “the broken society” turned us into a nation fearful to cross a housing estate. The Big Society could become a convenient way of saying that there is no more state money to help the weakest and most vulnerable.

Camila Batmanghelidjh, who stood out at the launch of the coalition’s Big Society last month, sitting between David Cameron and Nick Clegg in her turquoise turban, patchwork gloves and lilac eyeshadow, is afraid. So is Professor Tanya Byron, the child psychologist, academic and Times columnist. They worry that the most dislocated, disturbed, abused children will be trodden over by the new regime as it tries to cut budgets.

The country’s two most prominent child specialists met at a party a year ago. “She is my heroine,” says Tanya. “You couldn’t not notice Camila in a crowd. I saw her, she saw me and that was it, we have been friends ever since.”

Camila, who has twice remortgaged her house to keep her Kids Company charity going — it has helped 14,000 disadvantaged children at five centres and 38 schools in London — is determined to shout about these children with no voice. “We have created a culture in which vulnerable children are fighting for care, whether it’s those on the streets caught up in the criminal network or whether they are struggling through the child protection system or mental health system,” she says. “Society isn’t honouring its pledge to children. We created the Children’s Act, which said that if your biological parent failed in their contract of care to a child, the State would step in. Well, the State isn’t doing that.”

Tanya, who was an adviser to the last Government and will continue to advise the coalition, sees no difference since the coalition came to power. Politicians talk about Sure Start and setting up academies, both women say, but are ignoring the most vulnerable children who may not attend either. Camila says: “The majority of our kids are being neglected and abused by the people closest to them, who are hardly going to be the people who take them to play centres or start their own schools.”

Tanya agrees, “My question is, “Who are going to be recipients of this Big Society?” Not young people on the street — everyone is terrified of them, they just see the headlines about gangs and feral yobs and run a mile. But many of these children are not being fed, taken to school, taught how to wash or given any proper food. These children tend to react in one of two ways: they will either become very withdrawn and start self-harming to manifest their distress, or they will become angry — they’re the fighters. In the face of neglect and abuse they are fighting to survive; you can’t blame them.”

Britain likes to pride itself on its child-friendly policies but Camila, who trained as a psychotherapist, points out that we now come bottom of Unicef’s wellbeing index for children. “By professionalising childcare Britain has sabotaged the informal network of care that would happen between the young and adults,” she says. The problem, she believes, is that communities are now too afraid to become involved. “It’s hard now, as you are often worried about being called a paedophile if you befriend a child in need,” she says.

Tanya concurs. “Fear is the key word here. We are very risk-averse and don’t want to touch a child in case we are doing the wrong thing.”

The British, both women believe, now think it unnatural to see children playing on the street, so they immediately assume that any teenager hanging around on a bike is going to be trouble. “Most kids are raised in captivity,” says Tanya. “They do their growing up online, so the few children out on the street are immediately seen as a threat and feral. Parents need to let their children out — they face more fear at home through cyber-bullying and sexting than they would in their street, and everyone would benefit if they all were able to mix together in open spaces.”

Camila, an exile from Iran, says that we ignore the plight of many children simply because they are immigrants. “They loved that word during the election — immigrants are seen as taking school places and hospital appointments, but many children of illegal immigrants are living in terrible poverty. I found a family of eight children living in a garden shed with the windows broken because they had no legal papers.”

She survived becoming a refugee, the loss of all her family’s money, enduring years when she thought that her father was dead (in fact he survived the revolution) and the suicide of her sister. Now she wants to help others to achieve a positive outcome. “We do Comic Relief to help children in Africa,” she says, “whereas in our own inner cities we are starving African children.”

When she started working with vulnerable children, one of the first cases she came across was a seven-year-old girl who was trying to kill herself by putting a plastic reading folder over her head and wrapping a towel round it. She finally disclosed to Camila that she had been abused by three men living in her tower block.

Surely this is what the coalition is all about — helping the most fragile, even when cutbacks are being made in every other area. Tanya laughs. “The Tories’ Broken Society was about condemnation — understanding less and punishing more.” Camila is equally sceptical. “The coalition, especially in a recession, is bound to be more worried about sounding tough than trying to understand. At present Britain locks up more children than any other European country apart from Turkey, spending £298 million a year incarcerating more than 3,000 children.” The Kids Company founder worries that this won’t change.

“At the moment 550,000 children each year, on average, are referred to child protection. About 35,000 are placed on the child protection register and given a social worker. These social workers will have 24 children on their caseload and see about four a week, so even the worst cases aren’t seen very often. Then they deregister the same number of children that they register each year, to keep the number static at 35,000. Abused children aren’t that statistically organised. You realise that someone is controlling these figures.”

Meanwhile, beleaguered social workers have, according to Camila, become almost as traumatised as the children. “They are shattered and exhausted. That is what happened with Baby P, when they became overwhelmed by seeing children on estates regularly starved and abused. I know social work departments who are having discussions about what kind of sexual abuse they will accept. They take abused children who have been penetrated but not those who have been “merely” touched. In very dysfunctional areas teachers and social workers have stopped bothering to refer children, as they know that nothing will happen and the child will be rounded on by a parent as a sneak, or the workers will be attacked by relatives with dogs and have no back-up.”

This is why neither woman trusts the Government when it talks about a Big Society. The scale of the problem is too large for a group of volunteers, Camila and Tanya say.

“The Big Society looks like a lovely hollow balloon at the moment. It worries me — it just means that the Government will no longer pay,” says Camila, who, as Social Entrepreneur of the Year in 2005, is one of David Cameron’s key influences.

According to Tanya, only a bigger State can deliver a Big Society. “A Big Society will need to pay through the tax system and adjust its sense of entitlement against the offspring of immigrants and benefits claimants,” she says. “’I am worried that investment is going to go down in acute mental health for kids. When I see a child in handcuffs who has spent two nights on an adult psychiatric ward with no specialised care, I feel ashamed for being part of this system. The waiting list for children’s services is ridiculous — by the time children get to the top of the list they have serious problems.”

Voluntary organisations such as Kids Company can help, says Camila, but only as a complement to the State, not as a replacement for it: “I am a strong person, I am in the centre of the business world and can raise cash for my projects but most communities can’t.”

Months lost to bureaucracy and underfunding can permanently blight a child’s life, she explains. “We need to break the cycle early and meet their needs quickly. There need to be kids’ centres everywhere. It makes sense financially to get these children before they start going through the criminal justice system. It may cost more in the short term but it would mean that we could save billions of pounds later.”

Danny Alexander, the new Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and his team of cost-cutters could find the money by asking middle-class parents to surrender some of their perks. “It is a luxury in these times to give child benefit to everyone when a few children need that money so much more,” says Camila. When she had finished confiscating goodies from the middle classes, she would move on to those who live comfortably on welfare. “Some people are earning much more on benefits than by working — we need to change that, by making sure work is financially viable.”

It is an enormous challenge for the new Government, Tanya admits. “They have only just kicked off their shoes. But if we are going to talk about a broken society, we should be talking about how to cope with the children whom this broken society has created, not just about crime, violence and marriage break-up. If we vilify these children we have to ask what that says about us as a society.”

Camila confesses to being “gobsmacked” that no major party leader mentioned any children except his own during the election campaign. “You can be a male and be sensitive to these issues,” she says, “but it’s sad that in the minds of our politicians the vulnerable child remains absent.”

Ultimately, both women are determined to defend Britain’s most vulnerable children from the “blame game” played by populist politicians.

Camila says: “I want adults to stop condemning the weakest and start taking responsibility, and I want that reflected in the political narrative.” Tanya agrees: “We need to have the courage to say that these feral children are everyone’s problem and that together, as a humane society, we will find a solution.”

June 20, 2010

Daddy’s girls

Filed under: Bostonherald — Tags: , — admin @ 6:25 pm

I was 26 when my father died seven years ago. Although devastated, within a year I grew used to the idea — or so I thought. At first it felt odd saying “my mum” instead of “my parents” or not having to think of Christmas presents for a man. But I quickly adapted: I was part of a family of three, not four. I don’t remember grieving. It was a case of “we (my sister and I) have to look after mum”. Guilt over not doing that properly was far more dominant than sadness.

I cried only twice. Once when my mum broke the news that dad had cancer and two weeks before he died, after seeing him motionless on a hospital bed.

Despite being close to my father, his memory has faded more quickly than I imagined. As an adult who had left home, I have trouble remembering his role in my life. That sounds brutally dismissive, but selective memory is a coping mechanism. Any loss — whether a break-up or bereavement — is easier to accept if you convince yourself that the person wasn’t a pillar in your life any more. I’ve rarely had a chance to define what I miss. If you mention “dad” and “died” in the same sentence, friends and colleagues quickly change the subject.

This Father’s Day I wanted to talk to other women who lost their dads in early adulthood to find out whether we are as independent from our first male role model as we think.

Izzy Hutchison, 52, an artist and photographer, lost her father when she was 19 to pancreatic cancer: “My father was a deep thinker — a philosophical man and that was a steadying influence,” she says. “Mum is the nurturing one — she’ll mend my socks or tell me to go to bed if I’m ill. My father embraced having fun. When I was really enthusiastic about something, he enthused with me. Mum is interested of course, but only to a point.”

Like Hutchison, most women perceive gender-specific roles in their parents. Dr Terri Apter, a psychologist at the University of Cambridge, says: “Daughters often see their fathers as more objective than their mothers. Some women feel their mother thinks too highly of them, but they identify specific traits that their father appreciates, which boosts their confidence. It’s flattering to think that someone with more distance thinks you’re lovely and you’ll go far.”

Lisa Snell, 28, a video producer and presenter, lost her father when she was 20. “There’s nothing more special than a dad and his little girl,” says Snell. “That’s how I’ll always see my relationship with him. I don’t think about him all the time, but when I do, it’s like being a bit lost.

“It’s very different from the relationship with your mum. My mum and dad were the perfect team. My mum was more educated and the one who ran the house. My dad was creative — the fun one. But they complemented each other.”

I recognise the “fun” role. I formed a bond with my father because of our love of horses. We spent weekends competing at horse shows. He taught me to drive in a battered Ford transit horsebox, in a Sainsbury’s car park, long before I was legally old enough. He was a rule bender and I loved that.

While a father may be the parent who lightens the gloom of parental authority, his role in building a woman’s confidence is sometimes overlooked. Victoria Secunda interviewed hundreds of women for her books on parental relationships including Women and their Fathers and Losing Your Parents, Finding Yourself. “With successful women, there was often a father behind them who took a great interest in them. They tend to have higher self-esteem.”

That is reflected in Carole Best, 28, a youth employment adviser, who is about to marry. Her father died three years ago. “My dad made it clear that I should respect myself and my body. Growing up I felt like my dad’s princess. He told me how brilliant and how beautiful I was. His grounding made me choose someone who would love and respect me. He would love my fiancé and that gives me comfort.”

Labels such as “daddy’s princess” can seem derogatory but Apter says that closeness is inevitable. “There is a special romance between the different-sex, parent-child bond. Mothers and sons; fathers and daughters. It is not about sexual desire. There is a different element of richness and excitement in that bond, and that remains for a very long time.”

The Freudian idea of subconscious sexual attraction between a father and daughter is not something we like to visit. But Secunda acknowledges a connection. “If they had a good relationship, girls who have lost a father are more likely to seek father-like traits in a mate. Daughters idealise their fathers anyway. Especially if the father is no longer alive.”

Sharing my memories with other women has helped me to remember my dad’s influence. My sister recently described him as the person who gave us “roots and wings”. But I also have friends who have never had a relationship with their father and can’t relate to my sense of loss. So is loving and losing a father worse than never having loved a father? Apter says not: “With an absent father there is rage — why couldn’t he love me? With a dead father your sense of the relationship goes on. You can be sad but that is a much less disturbing emotion than anger.”

I regret not taking more time to grieve. I expended more energy repressing memories. That isn’t uncommon, says Pat Richer, a volunteer from the counselling service Cruse Bereavement Care. “For many people the reaction is, ‘I’ve got to get on with my life.’ That’s not necessarily unhealthy. But it can become unhealthy if it masks strong feelings that aren’t acknowledged, such as guilt or anger.”

No matter how long the lapse of time, a father’s influence is everlasting. Even though Hutchison’s loss was more than 30 years ago, she says: “When I think of my dad in certain situations — some tragedy or a happy family occasion —it still brings back deep feelings.”

Snell agrees: “My children will never know who my dad was. My boyfriend and brother-in-law don’t know who this significant, influential person was in my life. That’s a crazy idea.”

June 15, 2010

Losing the beauty of an older woman

Filed under: Bostonherald — Tags: , , , — admin @ 6:25 pm

When Madonna did a recent photoshoot for Louis Vuitton, the unretouched images were mischievously leaked to the press. An unflinching close-up of her face, before the airbrush artist had got to work, evokes a complex mix of feelings. Melancholy: even she who has applied her boundless wealth and energy to holding back time has sagging cheeks, an incipient wattle neck. Pity: how cruel to compare this with the “after” image, the tight, sculpted iconic face.

But finally fury: what is wrong with the strong, still-handsome face of a 51-year-old woman? No doubt Madonna has had a little “work” done here and there, but her face is still a fair reflection of her age, the accumulation of her experience, who she is. More so than the plastic fembot who appears in the campaign. Besides, middle-aged women are more able than twentysomethings to afford £700 Vuitton leather goods. Yet advertisers believe no one wants to buy a bag from an “old bag”.

Madonna has forged a career out of smashing taboos about female power and sexuality, but is not willing to take on the final challenge. To stand up, with her trademark insouciance and say: “Yeah, women age, so what. Here I am!” Instead, as Tina Fey put it in 30 Rock, she clings desperately onto youth with her “Gollum arms”.

The untouched image of Madonna would fit well into a photographic exhibition to be launched at the National Theatre, called Infinite Variety. It features images of women aged 48 to 95 and is curated by the actress Harriet Walter, who is appearing there in Thomas Middleton’s bloodsoaked drama Women Beware Women. Fittingly, her character Livia, a scheming aristocrat, reveals how the iniquitous treatment of older women is a timeless theme. In the play a 55-year-old Duke marries a 16-year-old girl promising status and wealth in exchange for sex. But when Livia offers the same deal to a lush young man, she faces public disgust. One is reminded immediately of Madonna and her 23-year-old lover Jesus Luz.

The exhibition, could not be more timely: older women broadcasters are rising up against the assumption their faces are repellent to viewers when they pass a certain age. After the sackings of Selina Scott, Anna Ford and Strictly Come Dancing judge Arlene Phillips, Country File presenter Miriam O’Reilly, 53, is suing the BBC for making her and three female colleagues of similar age redundant to be replaced by a younger woman. Meanwhile, older male colleagues kept their jobs.

In Infinite Variety we see plenty of characterful older faces, both actresses — including Vanessa Redgrave and Phyllida Law — and ordinary women, since Walter believes ageing is something “we are all in together”. But shouldn’t we be asking why women are perpetually judged by their physical appearance? Walter says she wasn’t trying to pretend wrinkles and grey hair are as sexy as youthful looks, but to break down disgust about ageing women.

“I think it is still important to broaden the range of what is beautiful,” she says. “What I am trying to put into the show is an inner light in these women, something about how they’ve lived their life. I want older women to feel happier in their skin and younger ones not to worry that the only fate ahead is the surgeon’s knife.”

Walter turns 60 this year, an age she describes as the “foothills of being properly old”. Yet with her trim, poker-backed classical actress’s frame she looks dashing on stage in her bustled red velvet dress.

“Older women complain that they can no longer turn a head,” she says. “Well, I don’t have instant beauty, but if you talked to me for half an hour you might get interested and start to see my face differently. It’s about animation, not just the texture of the skin. Now I look at people on the Tube and I think all of them are beautiful.”

Juliette Binoche once said that “actresses, ultimately, are responsible for the faces we give to women”. But now “civilian” women, as Liz Hurley calls us, have started to resent celebrities who, with their devotion to dieting and surgical procedures, have raised the bar to unattainable levels. Today it is acceptable to admit you are 50, but not to look it.

“Well,” counters Walter, “actresses like me are often not allowed to give women their faces.” She speaks of contemporaries who struggle to get any work. It is a view echoed last week by Juliet Stevenson, Gemma Jones and Lesley Manville, who accused writers of only creating parts for “nubile” women under 30. “All the executives are male,” said Stevenson. “They are chasing young skirt.”

But this is a perpetual lament from actresses. Maybe this disgust is too deep rooted and anthropolgical to overcome: attractiveness is so connected with perceived fertility, which seems why men — potent until much later — are forgiven for getting older. As Martin Amis once said “45 for women is an animal birthday”. Well, says, Walter drily “We have overcome our prejudices in other areas with our evolved intellects, so why not this one. We no longer drag women into caves by their hair, for example.”

If we stop being so repelled by ageing faces, we will bear to see them on TV, maybe then the experiences of a whole strata of the population will be told. “That is what upsets a lot of women: that my story doesn’t count. I play a small part on TV and I think “why don’t we focus on my character? She could be very interesting.” But they don’t. You’re just a function of the plot and that is very hard to swallow. And yet when you put a camera on anyone for 90 minutes, it is so intimate, you will fall in love with that person. It is just we are less likely to do that with an older woman.”

The problem is, Walter explains, women are cast in relation to men. A male detective can be anything between 40 and 55: but his wife or daughter must then fit a narrow age band. Also since drama is about conflict and responsibility it has been dominated by male figures and domains. “But now,” says Walter, “there are lots of arenas in which women are taking major decisions.”

And there is cause for optimism that film studios have realised older women will pay to see themselves on screen, will turn out in gangs to watch Mamma Mia or Sex and the City. Meanwhile, this year’s Baftas went to women playing middle-aged politicians: Rebecca Front as a minister in In the Thick of It and Julie Walters playing Mo Mowlam.

Moreover, when Harriet Walter rang her Los Angeles agent, to discuss working in American TV, joking that she’d obviously have to get a facelift first, he replied, “no longer”. Walter says: “He said it is becoming a problem shooting these faces which look so odd, they have to work out special camera angles. We were always taught at drama school that if you think something, it is reflected in your face. Surgery irons that out. You can’t do the often very minute expressions you need to do on screen. And facelifts homogenise people.

“We like to see real women’s faces on screen. Not just women but men too. I’ve never met a man who likes plastic surgery.”

Walter says she notices when friends have a little procedure. “I’m not a fascist about it. I sometimes think, oh, clever old you!”, but abhors the knife herself. It helps, she says, that she was never cast for her beauty, was accustomed as a young actress to see big parts go to more gorgeous near-contemporaries such as Greta Scacchi. And now she has crossed through from the tricky thirties and forties, when actresses are struggling to remain youthful, into the more forgiving territory of late middle age.

Indeed Walter, who has never married or had children, but lived for many years with the actor Peter Blythe until his death in 2004, has found herself a new man.

She won’t name him, but says he’s an American stage actor, a year her senior. “We met when I was doing Mary Stuart on Broadway. So he saw me looking like Elizabeth I. I said to him, ‘I may be the queen on stage but I’m not in the bedroom!’” She guffaws. They live on separate sides of the Atlantic but communicate for hours by Skype.

“The thing that younger women don’t understand,” she says, “is most of us don’t want to be younger. I am having a good time and my life is positive. I still dress well and have a sex life. What I want to say is it is not a crime or a shame to age. It is a fact. Let’s stop running away from it.” If only Madonna was so brave.

May 31, 2010

Young. British. Female. Muslim.

Filed under: Bostonherald — Tags: , , , — admin @ 6:25 pm

It’s a controversial time for British women to be wearing the hijab, the basic Muslim headscarf. Last month, Belgium became the first European country to pass legislation to ban the burka (the most concealing of Islamic veils), calling it a “threat” to female dignity, while France looks poised to follow suit. In Italy earlier this month, a Muslim woman was fined €500 (£430) for wearing the Islamic veil outside a post office.

And yet, while less than 2 per cent of the population now attends a Church of England service every week, the number of female converts to Islam is on the rise. At the London Central Mosque in Regent’s Park, women account for roughly two thirds of the “New Muslims” who make their official declarations of faith there – and most of them are under the age of 30.

Conversion statistics are frustratingly patchy, but at the time of the 2001 Census, there were at least 30,000 British Muslim converts in the UK. According to Kevin Brice, of the Centre for Migration Policy Research, Swansea University, this number may now be closer to 50,000 – and the majority are women. “Basic analysis shows that increasing numbers of young, university-educated women in their twenties and thirties are converting to Islam,” confirms Brice.

“Our liberal, pluralistic 21st-century society means we can choose our careers, our politics – and we can pick and choose who we want to be spiritually,” explains Dr Mohammad S. Seddon, lecturer in Islamic Studies at the University of Chester. We’re in an era of the “religious supermarket”, he says.




Joanne Bailey
Solicitor, 30, Bradford

“The first time I wore my hijab into the office, I was so nervous, I stood outside on the phone to my friend for ages going, ‘What on earth is everyone going to say?’ When I walked in, a couple of people asked, ‘Why are you wearing that scarf? I didn’t know you were a Muslim.’

“I’m the last person you’d expect to convert to Islam: I had a very sheltered, working-class upbringing in South Yorkshire. I’d hardly even seen a Muslim before I went to university.

“In my first job at a solicitor’s firm in Barnsley, I remember desperately trying to play the role of the young, single, career woman: obsessively dieting, shopping and going to bars – but I never felt truly comfortable.

“Then one afternoon in 2004 everything changed: I was chatting to a Muslim friend over coffee, when he noticed the little gold crucifix around my neck. He said, ‘Do you believe in God, then?’ I wore it more for fashion than religion and said, ‘No, I don’t think so,’ and he started talking about his faith.

“I brushed him off at first, but his words stuck in my mind. A few days later, I found myself ordering a copy of the Koran on the internet.

“It took me a while to work up the courage to go to a women’s social event run by the Leeds New Muslims group. I remember hovering outside the door thinking, ‘What the hell am I doing here?’ I imagined they would be dressed head-to-toe in black robes: what could I, a 25-year-old, blonde English girl, possibly have in common with them?

“But when I walked in, none of them fitted the stereotype of the oppressed Muslim housewife; they were all doctors, teachers and psychiatrists. I was struck by how content and secure they seemed. It was meeting these women, more than any of the books I read, that convinced me that I wanted to become a Muslim.

“After four years, in March 2008, I made the declaration of faith at a friend’s house. At first, I was anxious that I hadn’t done the right thing, but I soon relaxed into it – a bit like starting a new job.

“A few months later, I sat my parents down and said, ‘I’ve got something to tell you.’ There was a silence and my mum said, ‘You’re going to become Muslim, aren’t you?’ She burst into tears and kept asking things like, ‘What happens when you get married? Do you have to cover up? What about your job?’ I tried to reassure her that I’d still be me, but she was concerned for my welfare.

“Contrary to what most people think, Islam doesn’t oppress me; it lets me be the person that I was all along. Now I’m so much more content and grateful for the things I’ve got. A few months ago, I got engaged to a Muslim solicitor I met on a training course. He has absolutely no problem with my career, but I do agree with the Islamic perspective on the traditional roles for men and women. I want to look after my husband and children, but I also want my independence. I’m proud to be British and I’m proud to be Muslim – and I don’t see them as conflicting in any way.”

Aqeela Lindsay Wheeler
Housewife and mother, 26, Leicester

“As a teenager I thought all religion was pathetic. I used to spend every weekend getting drunk outside the leisure centre, in high-heeled sandals and miniskirts. My view was: what’s the point in putting restrictions on yourself? You only live once.

“At university, I lived the typical student existence, drinking and going clubbing, but I’d always wake up the next morning with a hangover and think, what’s the point?

“It wasn’t until my second year that I met Hussein. I knew he was a Muslim, but we were falling in love, so I brushed the whole issue of religion under the carpet. But six months into our relationship, he told me that being with me was ‘against his faith’.

“I was so confused. That night I sat up all night reading two books on Islam that Hussein had given me. I remember bursting into tears because I was so overwhelmed. I thought, ‘This could be the whole meaning of life.’ But I had a lot of questions: why should I cover my head? Why can’t I eat what I like?

“I started talking to Muslim women at university and they completely changed my view. They were educated, successful – and actually found the headscarf liberating. I was convinced, and three weeks later officially converted to Islam.

“When I told my mum a few weeks later, I don’t think she took it seriously. She made a few comments like, ‘Why would you wear that scarf? You’ve got lovely hair,’ but she didn’t seem to understand what it meant.

“My best friend at university completely turned on me: she couldn’t understand how one week I was out clubbing, and the next I’d given everything up and converted to Islam. She was too close to my old life, so I don’t regret losing her as a friend.

“I chose the name Aqeela because it means ‘sensible and intelligent’ – and that’s what I was aspiring to become when I converted to Islam six years ago. I became a whole new person: everything to do with Lindsay, I’ve erased from my memory.

“The most difficult thing was changing the way I dressed, because I was always so fashion-conscious. The first time I tried on the hijab, I remember sitting in front of the mirror, thinking, ‘What am I doing putting a piece of cloth over my head? I look crazy!’ Now I’d feel naked without it and only occasionally daydream about feeling the wind blow through my hair. Once or twice, I’ve come home and burst into tears because of how frumpy I feel – but that’s just vanity.

“It’s a relief not to feel that pressure any more. Wearing the hijab reminds me that all I need to do is serve God and be humble. I’ve even gone through phases of wearing the niqab [face veil] because I felt it was more appropriate – but it can cause problems, too.

“When people see a white girl wearing a niqab they assume I’ve stuck my fingers up at my own culture to ‘follow a bunch of Asians’. I’ve even had teenage boys shout at me in the street, ‘Get that s*** off your head, you white bastard.’ After the London bombings, I was scared to walk about in the streets for fear of retaliation.

“For the most part, I have a very happy life. I married Hussein and now we have a one-year-old son, Zakir. We try to follow the traditional Muslim roles: I’m foremost a housewife and mother, while he goes out to work. I used to dream of having a successful career as a psychologist, but now it’s not something I desire.

“Becoming a Muslim certainly wasn’t an easy way out. This life can sometimes feel like a prison, with so many rules and restrictions, but we believe that we will be rewarded in the afterlife.”

Catherine Heseltine
Nursery school teacher, 31, North London

“If you’d asked me at the age of 16 if I’d like to become a Muslim, I would have said, ‘No thanks.’ I was quite happy drinking, partying and fitting in with my friends.

“Growing up in North London, we never practised religion at home; I always thought it was slightly old-fashioned and irrelevant. But when I met my future husband, Syed, in the sixth form, he challenged all my preconceptions. He was young, Muslim, believed in God – and yet he was normal. The only difference was that, unlike most teenage boys, he never drank.

“A year later, we were head over heels in love, but we quickly realised: how could we be together if he was a Muslim and I wasn’t?

“Before meeting Syed, I’d never actually questioned what I believed in; I’d just picked up my casual agnosticism through osmosis. So I started reading a few books on Islam out of curiosity.

“In the beginning, the Koran appealed to me on an intellectual level; the emotional and spiritual side didn’t come until later. I loved its explanations of the natural world and discovered that 1,500 years ago, Islam gave women rights that they didn’t have here in the West until relatively recently. It was a revelation.

“Religion wasn’t exactly a ‘cool’ thing to talk about, so for three years I kept my interest in Islam to myself. But in my first year at university, Syed and I decided to get married – and I knew it was time to tell my parents. My mum’s initial reaction was, ‘Couldn’t you just live together first?’ She had concerns about me rushing into marriage and the role of women in Muslim households – but no one realised how seriously I was taking my religious conversion. I remember going out for dinner with my dad and him saying, ‘Go on, have a glass of wine. I won’t tell Syed!’ A lot of people assumed I was only converting to Islam to keep his family happy, not because I believed in it.

“Later that year, we had an enormous Bengali wedding, and moved into a flat together – but I certainly wasn’t chained to the kitchen sink. I didn’t even wear the hijab at all to start with, and wore a bandana or a hat instead.

“I was used to getting a certain amount of attention from guys when I went out to clubs and bars, but I had to let that go. I gradually adopted the Islamic way of thinking: I wanted people to judge me for my intelligence and my character – not for the way I looked. It was empowering.

“I’d never been part of a religious minority before, so that was a big adjustment, but my friends were very accepting. Some of them were a bit shocked: ‘What, no drink, no drugs, no men? I couldn’t do that!’ And it took a while for my male friends at university to remember things like not kissing me hello on the cheek any more. I’d have to say, ‘Sorry, it’s a Muslim thing.’

“Over time, I actually became more religious than my husband. We started growing apart in other ways, too. In the end, I think the responsibility of marriage was too much for him; he became distant and disengaged. After seven years together, I decided to get a divorce.

“When I moved back in with my parents, people were surprised I was still wandering around in a headscarf. But if anything, being on my own strengthened my faith: I began to gain a sense of myself as a Muslim, independent of him.

“Islam has given me a sense of direction and purpose. I’m involved with the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, and lead campaigns against Islamophobia, discrimination against women in mosques, poverty and the situation in Palestine. When people call us ‘extremists’ or ‘the dark underbelly of British politics’, I just think it’s ridiculous. There are a lot of problems in the Muslim community, but when people feel under siege it makes progress even more difficult.

“I still feel very much part of white British society, but I am also a Muslim. It has taken a while to fit those two identities together, but now I feel very confident being who I am. I’m part of both worlds and no one can take that away from me.”

Sukina Douglas
Spoken-word poet, 28, London

“Before I found Islam, my gaze was firmly fixed on Africa. I was raised a Rastafarian and used to have crazy-long dreadlocks: one half blonde and the other half black.

“Then, in 2005, my ex-boyfriend came back from a trip to Africa and announced that he’d converted to Islam. I was furious and told him he was ‘losing his African roots’. Why was he trying to be an Arab? It was so foreign to how I lived my life. Every time I saw a Muslim woman in the street I thought, ‘Why do they have to cover up like that? Aren’t they hot?’ It looked oppressive to me.

“Islam was already in my consciousness, but when I started reading the autobiography of Malcolm X at university, something opened up inside me. One day I said to my best friend, Muneera, ‘I’m falling in love with Islam.’ She laughed and said, ‘Be quiet, Sukina!’ She only started exploring Islam to prove me wrong, but soon enough she started believing it, too.

“I was always passionate about women’s rights; there was no way I would have entered a religion that sought to degrade me. So when I came across a book by a Moroccan feminist, it unravelled all my negative opinions: Islam didn’t oppress women; people did.

“Before I converted, I conducted an experiment. I covered up in a long gypsy skirt and headscarf and went out. But I didn’t feel frumpy; I felt beautiful. I realised, I’m not a sexual commodity for men to lust after; I want to be judged for what I contribute mentally.

“Muneera and I took our shahada [declaration of faith] together a few months later, and I cut my dreadlocks off to represent renewal: it was the beginning of a new life.

“Just three weeks after our conversion, the 7/7 bombings happened; suddenly we were public enemy No 1. I’d never experienced racism in London before, but in the weeks after the bombs, people would throw eggs at me and say, ‘Go back to your own country,’ even though this was my country.

“I’m not trying to shy away from any aspect of who I am. Some people dress in Arabian or Pakistani styles, but I’m British and Caribbean, so my national dress is Primark and Topshop, layered with colourful charity-shop scarves.

“Six months after I converted, I got back together with my ex-boyfriend, and now we’re married. Our roles in the home are different, because we are different people, but he would never try to order me around; that’s not how I was raised.

“Before I found Islam, I was a rebel without a cause, but now I have a purpose in life: I can identify my flaws and work towards becoming a better person. To me, being a Muslim means contributing to your society, no matter where you come from.”

Catherine Huntley
Retail assistant, 21, Bournemouth

“My parents always thought I was abnormal, even before I became a Muslim. In my early teens, they’d find me watching TV on a Friday night and say, ‘What are you doing at home? Haven’t you got any friends to go out with?’

“The truth was: I didn’t like alcohol, I’ve never tried smoking and I wasn’t interested in boys. You’d think they’d have been pleased.

“I’ve always been quite a spiritual person, so when I started studying Islam in my first year of GCSEs, something just clicked. I would spend every lunchtime reading about Islam on the computer. I had peace in my heart and nothing else mattered any more. It was a weird experience – I’d found myself, but the person I found wasn’t like anyone else I knew.

“I’d hardly ever seen a Muslim before, so I didn’t have any preconceptions, but my parents weren’t so open-minded. I hid all my Muslim books and headscarves in a drawer, because I was so scared they’d find out.

“When I told my parents, they were horrified and said, ‘We’ll talk about it when you’re 18.’ But my passion for Islam just grew stronger. I started dressing more modestly and would secretly fast during Ramadan. I got very good at leading a double life until one day, when I was 17, I couldn’t wait any longer.

“I sneaked out of the house, put my hijab in a carrier bag and got on the train to Bournemouth. I must have looked completely crazy putting it on in the train carriage, using a wastebin lid as a mirror. When a couple of old people gave me dirty looks, I didn’t care. For the first time in my life, I felt like myself.

“A week after my conversion, my mum came marching into my room and said, ‘Have you got something to tell me?’ She pulled my certificate of conversion out of her pocket. I think they’d rather have found anything else at that point – drugs, cigarettes, condoms – because at least they could have put it down to teenage rebellion.

“I could see the fear in her eyes. She couldn’t comprehend why I’d want to give up my freedom for the sake of a foreign religion. Why would I want to join all those terrorists and suicide bombers?

“It was hard being a Muslim in my parents’ house. I’ll never forget one evening, there were two women in burkas on the front page of the newspaper, and they started joking, ‘That’ll be Catherine soon.’

“They didn’t like me praying five times a day either; they thought it was ‘obsessive’. I’d pray right in front of my bedroom door so my mum couldn’t walk in, but she would always call upstairs, ‘Catherine, do you want a cup of tea?’ just so I’d have to stop.

“Four years on, my grandad still says things like, ‘Muslim women have to walk three steps behind their husbands.’ It gets me really angry, because that’s the culture, not the religion. My fiancé, whom I met eight months ago, is from Afghanistan and he believes that a Muslim woman is a pearl and her husband is the shell that protects her. I value that old-fashioned way of life: I’m glad that when we get married he’ll take care of paying the bills. I always wanted to be a housewife anyway.

“Marrying an Afghan man was the cherry on the cake for my parents. They think I’m completely crazy now. He’s an accountant and actually speaks better English than I do, but they don’t care. The wedding will be in a mosque, so I don’t think they’ll come. It hurts to think I’ll never have that fairytale wedding, surrounded by my family. But I hope my new life with my husband will be a lot happier. I’ll create the home I’ve always wanted, without having to feel the pain of people judging me.”

May 12, 2010

No Ronaldinho, but injured, retired stars called up for Cup

Filed under: The Sydney Morning Herald — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 1:30 am









Return to video

Video feedback

Thank you.

Your feedback was successfully sent.





Ronaldinho was left out of Brazil’s probable World Cup squad, Francesco Totti and Luca Toni were missing from Italy’s 30-man squad and Jamie Carragher came out of retirement for England as coaches issued their provisional lists on Tuesday.

The coaches of the 32 teams headed for next month’s championship in South Africa faced a FIFA deadline of Tuesday to announce provisional 30-man squads.

The lists included some walking wounded who hope to be fit for the tournament, some unexpected inclusions and some big names who missed out.


Brazil coach Dunga announced his main 23-man squad first, causing a fuss when Ronaldinho missed out. Dunga later unveiled a full 30-man provisional squad that included Ronaldinho, but made it clear that the AC Milan star would only be used in case of injuries.

————————–

ALL PROVISIONAL SQUADS FOR THE WORLD CUP

————————–

The coaches of the 32 teams headed for next month’s championship in South Africa faced a FIFA deadline of Tuesday to announce provisional 30-man squads.

The lists included some walking wounded who hope to be fit for the tournament, some unexpected inclusions and some big names who missed out.

Brazil coach Dunga announced his main 23-man squad first, causing a fuss when Ronaldinho missed out. Dunga later unveiled a full 30-man provisional squad that included Ronaldinho, but made it clear that the AC Milan star would only be used in case of injuries.

Adriano and Neymar were left out of Brazil’s 30-man squad, along with three-time FIFA world player of the year Ronaldo and veteran left back Roberto Carlos.

Dunga has stuck to most of the players who helped Brazil win last year’s Confederations Cup and finish top of South American qualifying.

“These players are winners,” Dunga said.

 ”There is no doubt that they are prepared to help Brazil reach its goal. They are ready to give their best for the country.

“Ronaldinho’s quality and capacity as a player is indisputable. But my decision has to be made based on reason. I have to make a decision based on what happens on the field.”

Karim Benzema was a surprise omission from France’s provisional squad and coach Raymond Domenech said it was because of his form on the field rather than allegations of his involvement in an under-age sex scandal with an escort.

“To me this is not a concern,” said Domenech, who also left out veteran midfielder Patrick Vieira but selected out-of-form striker Thierry Henry.

“I’m only thinking about football and about what the players want to give on the pitch.”

World Player of the Year Lionel Messi will lead Argentina’s attack at the World Cup, but there was no room for veteran defender and Inter Milan captain Javier Zanetti in coach Diego Maradona’s provisional list.

The 30-man Argentina squad included four high-profile forwards to support Barcelona’s Messi – Gonzalo Higuain, Diego Milito, Martin Palermo and Carlos Tevez.

Ruud van Nistelrooy was left out of the Netherlands squad despite having recovered from a long-term knee injury. Netherlands coach Bert van Marwijk said the 34-year-old former Manchester United and Real Madrid striker was not at a high enough level to play at the World Cup.

There was speculation that Totti might also come out of international retirement to help Italy defend the World Cup. But when Marcello Lippi’s squad was announced, there was no sign of his name, nor that of Toni, despite seven strikers being picked.

Because the final 23 must come from these provisional lists, that means no chance for Totti of Toni unless there is a serious injury to one of the other squad members.

Spain’s Xavi Hernandez, Cesc Fabregas and Fernando Torres were selected despite carrying injuries. The deadline for the final squad is three weeks away.

Eighteen of the Spain squad of 23 that triumphed impressively at the 2008 European Championship are in this one, too.

Carragher quit England’s national team three years ago, complaining he could never get a start under coach Steve McClaren. But the 32-year-old Liverpool defender was in the 30-man squad announced by Fabio Capello.

Capello included Gareth Barry even though the Manchester City midfielder is sidelined for three weeks with ankle ligament damage. He will miss England’s friendlies against Mexico and Japan and the squad’s two pre-World Cup training camps in Austria.

With defenders Ledley King and Rio Ferdinand dealing with persistent injury problems, Capello decided to bring Carragher back.

“The FA got in touch a few weeks ago and asked if I would have a rethink, due to injury problems,” Carragher said.

“I said I would make myself available.”

A former teammate of Carragher’s at Liverpool and now with Turkey’s Galatasaray, Australia’s Harry Kewell is struggling with a groin injury but Socceroos coach Pim Verbeek is confident he will make it in time for South Africa.

“There are rumours, there are opinions. But Harry will be ready,” Verbeek said.

“The medical staff and Harry himself convinced me that Harry will be OK. We still have five weeks to prepare for the first game against Germany, so don’t worry – Harry will be there.”

First up for England is a group game against the United States at Rustenburg on June 12.

US coach Bob Bradley had no surprises in his squad but could not find a place for Charlie Davies, who made a good recovery from a car smash but has been sidelined for seven months.

Switzerland selected its final squad of 23 three weeks early and has included 18-year-old Xherdan Shaqiria, who has only 45 minutes of international experience. The FC Basel midfielder made his club debut in July and had his first taste of international football against Uruguay in a friendly on March 3.

Ivory Coast coach Sven-Goran Eriksson has a largely European-based squad of players that features Didier Drogba, whose 29 goals helped Chelsea win the Premier League.

But the former England and Mexico coach said on Tuesday he didn’t want his team to rely too heavily on Drogba’s goals.

“It’s not enough to hope Drogba will go out and score some goals,” Eriksson said.

“If we don’t play as a team, we cannot be impressive. Quality isn’t enough in football, you need to work together.”

AP

May 11, 2010

Daisuke Matsuzaka sparkles in 6-1 Red Sox win over Toronto

Filed under: Bostonherald — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 9:48 pm

Daisuke Matsuzaka allowed three hits in seven innings and the Boston Red Sox [team stats] capitalized on more wildness by Toronto Blue Jays pitchers for a 6-1 win Tuesday night.

Matsuzaka struck out nine and allowed just three runners on a single and double by John Buck and a double by Fred Lewis. He walked none, while four Toronto pitchers issued eight bases on balls one night after the Red Sox drew seven walks in a 7-6 win.

The Red Sox won their third straight as Matsuzaka (2-1) had the best outing of his three games since coming off the disabled list after recovering from a neck strain. In each of his other two starts, he had one terrible inning but was otherwise solid.

Dana Eveland (3-2) gave up all of Boston’s runs in four-plus innings.

In Petero we trust: stars step up pay-rise push

Filed under: The Sydney Morning Herald — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 1:30 pm

SENIOR NRL players have agreed to use the upcoming negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement to push for changes to the salary cap and increased representative payments.

The issues were among those discussed by Petero Civoniceva and other leading players before a four-hour meeting yesterday between the Penrith captain and Rugby League Players Association chief executive David Garnsey.

Civoniceva has been endorsed by the other players as their spokesman and they wanted him to ensure Garnsey was aware of how strongly they felt about issues such as the salary cap and the continued loss of stars such as Israel Folau, who is tipped to follow Karmichael Hunt to AFL and sign with GWS.

Other big-name players, including Melbourne captain Cameron Smith, had been expected to join Civoniceva at the meeting with Garnsey but the Kangaroos hooker was unable to attend as he was receiving treatment on his injured elbow in a bid to be fit for Origin I.

Brisbane and Australian captain Darren Lockyer also could not make it to Sydney for the meeting but Civoniceva had spoken to several senior players before his mid-afternoon arrival at the RLPA’s Homebush headquarters.

The RLPA is due to begin negotiations for a new EBA in coming weeks and it is understood the players want Garnsey to seek a significant rise in the salary cap and the lifting of restrictions on third-party agreements.

The players also want increased representative payments for State of Origin and Test matches, which they believe will help the stars to turn down approaches from rugby union and AFL, and a lift in the minimum wage to help squad members at the bottom end of each club’s top 25.

”There’s stuff that senior players and captains do talk about and I am sure we will be doing that,” Civoniceva said. ”It’s got to be done the right way and the senior players are working with the association.”

Garnsey added: ”Acting collectively is the only way the players will achieve what they want to achieve.”

Civoniceva ruled out strike action but players feel so strongly about restrictions on their earning capacity that 37 per cent of those polled in the latest issue of Rugby League Week out today want the salary cap abolished.

That was just one of the stunning findings contained in the annual players’ poll, which shows how much the Melbourne Storm salary cap scandal has divided the game.

There was little sympathy for Melbourne players, with 62 per cent believing they were fully aware of illegal payments, some in the form of third-party bonuses, boats, shopping vouchers and plasma TV sets.

One former Storm player told RLW he was aware of cash payments to several stars in his time at the club.

“One guy told me he regularly got cash – it can never be detected but it happened,” the unnamed player said. “And good luck to him.”

Players were also critical of David Gallop’s performance as NRL chief executive and his handling of the Storm issue. Asked if they thought Gallop was doing a good job overall, 66 per cent responded positively and 34 per cent said no. On the issue of the Storm’s salary cap breach and the punishment meted out, only 52 per cent said they were happy with the way he had dealt with the situation.

Half of the 100 players felt the Storm should be given back their 2007 and 2009 premierships, but 39 per cent said the club should have been kicked out of this year’s competition.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress

Powered by Yahoo! Answers